When some busy mothers get a second to spare, they take a moment to relax. Not Nolsita Siyang.
A member of the Palawan indigenous group, Siyang is a farmer and mother of 10 who, when she isn’t climbing several miles of muddy footpath between her mountain village and the market to sell her family’s surplus crops, can be found volunteering as a forest ranger in the Mount Mantalingahan Protected Landscape. Uncertainty about who she will encounter in the forest makes it a dangerous job — and she’s one of the only women doing it.
Editor’s note: Last year, Human Nature blogged about the challenges of protecting the Bosque de Agua (Water Forest), a large swath of trees and grassland that supplies drinking water for more than 23 million people in and around Mexico City. This week, Conservation International’s (CI) Jürgen Hoth presented about the importance of grassland restoration at the meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD COP 13) in Cancun; in this interview with Human Nature, he talks air pollution, the illegal drug trade and why planting trees isn’t always the answer.
Question: Mexico has been on something of a tree-planting frenzy lately. Why?
Answer: Last March, dangerous air pollution in Mexico City saw its worst spike in 11 years. This was largely due to thermal inversion: In the wintertime, warmer air near the Earth’s surface cannot disperse like in summertime because of the layer of colder, denser air on top, so the pollution remains concentrated.
Sadly, air pollution is nothing new for the country. The worst of Mexico’s pollution was in the early ’80s, when dead birds began falling from the sky. In 1985, we had a massive, deadly earthquake, and people realized that Mexico City was highly vulnerable. A lot of the polluting industry moved out of the city, which greatly improved air quality. So everyone was caught off guard last winter when they saw how severe the pollution was.
One problem is that Mexico City is still growing every day — and there are many more cars than there once were. The city has taken important steps forward with public transit, creating bicycle routes, etc., but most people still prefer to travel by car. During the worst smog, people stopped going to work and children stopped playing in the schoolyards, because the air quality was too dangerous. There was a huge public outcry, and the government’s response was “Let’s plant more trees.” The goal is now to plant 18 million trees. But here’s the thing: all trees are not created equal, as I have seen in my work in the Water Forest.
Editor’s note: The fate of the Pacific Islands has always been inextricably linked to the fate of the vast ocean in which they lie — an ocean which faces unprecedented threats.
In the wake of the success of Disney’s new film, “Moana,” in which a young girl journeys across the sea in a traditional sailing canoe, Conservation International (CI), Walt Disney Animation Studios and the Samoa Voyaging Society (SVS) have announced a new partnership to bring conservation education and awareness to coastal Samoan communities. With technical support from CI and the Samoan government, SVS Captain Fani Bruun and her crew will sail between villages on their traditional double-hulled voyaging canoe, the Gaualofa, and present free workshops on basic coastal and marine management. They will also host free screenings of “Moana.”
Human Nature asked Schannel van Dijken, marine program director for CI’s Pacific Oceanscape program, president of SVS and an experienced sailor of va’a (Polynesian sailing canoes) himself, to explain why these boats are so central to Polynesian culture.
Question:How has your experience sailing voyaging canoes affected how you view conservation?
Answer: I have been associated with the Samoa Voyaging Society since I started with CI in 2009. I have always felt connected to the ocean, so it was a natural fit to work with the voyaging society, and I easily gravitated to it. Voyaging is a perfect platform for education and outreach given the importance it holds for communities around the Pacific. The va’a has the power to reconnect our communities to their past and to honor what our ancestors did in migrating across the Pacific, colonizing these small specks of islands in the middle of the largest ocean in the world. The va’a honors the wisdom and expertise they had in doing that and reflects the way they viewed the natural world and the innate harmony they achieved with it. The canoe allows us to remind people of how we once lived, what we were capable of and how we viewed our natural world. By looking to the past, we are able to bring attention to the present, and ultimately to use the past to guide us into the future.
Editor’s note: In order to adequately protect the species and ecosystems that form the backbone of a healthy planet, their value must be better integrated into the global economy. As scientists and policymakers gather in Cancun to discuss how to achieve this, Conservation International’s (CI) Carlos Manuel Rodriguez shares how a recent policy exchange between two countries helped spread the word about how to do it.
On the mountain slopes of Costa Rica’s Caribbean coast, a group of Cambodians got their first glimpse of a flock of great green macaws perching in a nearby tree. More than 50 birds, representing as much as one-fourth of the total population of this endangered species, ate fruit and socialized as our group talked with Juan Campos, a Costa Rican farmer who over the last decade has improved his agricultural practices and now protects his forest. What caused this change? Campos now gets paid for the water his forested land produces, given its location uphill from a hydroelectric power plant.
This jungle-friendly farm provided the perfect backdrop for the purpose of our visit: showing Cambodian leaders how my home country has managed to transform its economy from one dependent on smallholder agriculture into a healthier one built on protecting and sustainably using nature. Continue reading →
As Human Nature wrote in February, if the Earth’s oceans were a man, he would not be the picture of health.
At least — for now — his condition is stable.
A tool developed by Conservation International (CI) and partners to provide governments, communities and businesses with the data they need to make sustainable decisions about ocean use has given the ocean its annual check-up. Its health “score”: 71 out of 100, the same as last year. While the score, calculated using the Ocean Health Index (OHI), isn’t as high as it could be, it doesn’t paint as grim a picture as it seems, according to one expert.
“This score sends a message that the ocean isn’t ‘dying’ the way many people think, but that people and marine life will fare much better when we use it in more sustainable ways,” said Steve Katona, OHI’s managing director.
There’s more to this story, though, than the overall score.
The Aichi Targets, which range from specific goals — such as protecting 17 percent of terrestrial and 10 percent of coastal and marine areas — to less defined ones — such as expanding global awareness of the value of biodiversity — were intended to be achieved by 2020. With four years left for countries to make progress, Conservation International (CI) joined with four other global conservation organizations — Birdlife International, The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Nature Conservancy and WWF — to determine how countries are progressing toward these targets. We looked at how countries matched their ambition to each Aichi Target as well as their progress in meeting their goals.
While our report shows positive progress on a number of the targets, the overall picture is poor, with inadequate progress to date in most countries. Unless countries significantly increase their ambition through more resources and improved policies for biodiversity protection, the Aichi Targets will not be met, and we will increasingly undermine the long-term well-being of humanity.
For the government of Laos, the newest dam is part of a larger plan to develop and export hydroelectricity, which could, in turn, mean a boost for the Southeast Asian country’s struggling economy. But critics say development of the dam is short-sighted and could lead to dangerous consequences for the river, which snakes through China, Myanmar, Laos, Thailand and Cambodia before reaching the sea in Vietnam. The dam, critics say, could further disrupt fish migration and the flow of water and nutrient-rich sediment to the fields and inland fisheries that nearly 60 million people depend on for their protein and livelihoods.
Balancing energy production with conservation is an age-old dilemma. Now, a new tool could help enable simpler — and smarter — decisions in places like the Mekong watershed where complex water flows are concerned.
Most days, Gertruida Cloete rises before dawn, walks three kilometers to tend to her livestock, follows them for hours as they graze and then treks back home. In the dry, punishing landscape of South Africa’s Namaqualand, where Cloete lives, it’s a long day for anyone — let alone a 70-year-old woman.
Climate change impacts such as more frequent droughts are expected to make farming in this area more difficult, forcing herders like Cloete to change their traditional practices. To help farmers adapt to these changes, Conservation South Africa is working with them through initiatives such as the Biodiversity and Red Meat farming cooperative. The cooperative gives farmers a range of incentives to help maintain the condition of the veld (grassland) and the water in their pastures.
See a day in the life of Gertrude Cloete in this post from March.
GIVE BACK TO NATURE
Donate to Conservation International to support conservation heroes like Gertruida Cloete.
Editor’s note:From “climate adaptation” to “ecosystem services,” environmental jargon is everywhere these days. Conservation International’s Human Nature blog looks to make sense of it in an occasional explainer series we’re calling “What on Earth?”
In this installment, we break down “conservation finance,” which isn’t as dull as it sounds — and which might be the final frontier for protecting nature.
What is ‘conservation finance’?
“Conservation finance” refers generally to a range of financial mechanisms that can help fund the conservation of nature.
Ok. But why do we need to pay for conservation in the first place?
The short answer is that conservation is often just one choice among many that countries and communities make. For example, if you own an acre of tropical forest, leaving the forest in place likely won’t generate the income and livelihoods that you are seeking. So, you may sell the trees for timber and put a farm there — which will make you money in the short term but may not be sustainable over the long term.
Conservation finance seeks to flip that script by aligning incentives to make standing forests (or other ecosystems) more valuable standing than cut. This can create powerful monetary incentives to keep ecosystems intact while still accounting for people’s reliance on these places for their lives and livelihoods.