U.S. lifts ban on some elephant trophy imports

An elephant near the Mara North Conservancy in Kenya. A new U.S. move to allow the import of some legally hunted elephants as trophies has raised concerns among many conservation groups. (© Jon McCormack/Conservation International)


Editor’s note: An update to this story: On Nov. 17, 2017, U.S. President Donald Trump reversed the government’s decision to permit the import of some elephant trophies. The decision is on hold pending a review, news outlets reported.

On Wednesday, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the remains of legally hunted elephants in two African countries can be imported into the United States.

The move, which reverses a ban established in 2014 under the Obama administration, pertains to elephants killed in Zambia and neighboring Zimbabwe in southern Africa. In an informal statement, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said that the money paid for permits to hunt the animals — listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act — could put “much-needed revenue back into conservation,” The Washington Post reported.

Some conservation groups painted a different picture, expressing grave concerns about the effect of the move on the global effort to stem the ivory trade, which has fueled organized crime networks around the world and caused populations of the iconic animals to plummet across the continent.

“This is the wrong move at the wrong time for protecting Africa’s wildlife,” said M. Sanjayan, CEO of Conservation International. “It is baffling that this action would be a priority at this time.”

Calling the Trump administration’s move “highly disturbing,” Sanjayan was sharply critical of the reasoning behind it.

“The original ban was enacted based on detailed findings on the condition of elephant populations on the ground, and it strains credulity to suggest that local science-based factors have been met to justify this change,” he said. “What’s more, this move sends a dangerous signal to poachers and to our allies about the commitment of the United States to ending the trade in ivory and endangered animal products.”

The past few years have seen seismic shifts against the ivory trade and the poaching that fuels it. In recent months, China and the United Kingdom — two of the world’s largest ivory importers — have announced plans to close their markets. Meanwhile, countries across Africa — from Gabon to Botswana — have committed to closing their own ivory markets and have taken steps to reduce or eliminate their ivory stockpiles.


Donate to fund crucial conservation work helping to protect elephants and their habitats.

Yet the trade endures, and in places that some might not expect: According to a report released earlier this year, none other than Washington, D.C., was judged to be the seat of the ivory trade in the United States. Recent crackdowns on markets in California and New York, the report found, simply pushed it elsewhere.

Meanwhile, an African elephant is killed for its tusks every 15 minutes.

The rule change applies to elephants shot in Zimbabwe starting in January 2016, and to those legally permitted to be hunted before the end of next year, the Post reported, and a similar rule has been put into place for Zambia.

The change will not be official until a notice is formally filed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a move expected to occur later this week. By regulation, the service must show that importing hunted trophies will enhance the conservation success of African elephants in the wild, an analysis sure to be scrutinized by conservationists. A broader ban by the United States on ivory sales appears to remain intact.

Sanjayan called upon the government to rethink its action and to allow the public to weigh in on the ban. “I urge the Trump administration to reconsider this decision with full public comment and participation,” he said.

Bruno Vander Velde is CI’s editorial director. 

Want to read more stories like this? Sign up for email updates here. Donate to Conservation International here.


    1. save africa says

      Since Trump took office, and I knew this was happening after following his son donald jr. this country is being run by trophy hunters, even the interior secretary of state, Ryan Zinke is a trophy hunter. It troubles me that the SCI is able to jump in on this decision making but not conversationalists groups and animal rights organizations like the humane society. From my understanding is that the SCI heavily funds the republican campaign. It’s a sad thing that these ionic animals we grew up with are perishing fast. While Trump is in the seat, this will be an uphill battle. It doesn’t matter how much proof there is they don’t want to see it. Trumps placing the decision on hold, claiming he thought that the killing of these animals doesn’t help conservation and he thought the idea of killing these animals is “horrible”, is just a “make me look good” and leave it up to Ryan Zinke a “trophy hunter”,so he takes no blame. Now he can get back to convincing the people that he is “making america great again”

  1. Catherine McAdams says

    The President need to talk to Mr Robert Marks from Globus Tours in Africa. He thinks highly of our President and he knows about Africa. I went there for a safari and was informed that the pouching of the elephants for their tusks have been mostly stopped but if this band is lifted, than that open the door to pouching because it gives the green light to selling Ivory in the United State and other countries. I hope our President doesn’t let this happen. I know they should have a permit to do all of this but we know, there is always ways around it. Sad

  2. Pingback: Ban on US Import of Elephant Trophies Remains, For Now - Viral Things

  3. James A Lewis says

    there needs to be a ban on killing of any animal for sport. who do we think we are. who gives permission to do this ??? who is claiming to be GOD.. let them kill each other for sport.. animals bleed red blood. they have young, they scream when in pain. they protect there young. they have rights. they should not even be called animals, we should be called animals

  4. Pingback: The price of a dead elephant | Human Nature - Conservation International Blog

  5. Mike Botts says

    In practically the same sentence you say that illegal elephant hunting is killing the elephants so you want to stop legal hunting which helps to save them. That will work about as well as the strict gun bans in Chicago.

  6. Allyson Kettler says

    “an African elephant is killed for its tusks every 15 minutes.”

    Haven’t the Trumps’ had their 15 minutes of fame? Why do they need to have these banned 15 minutes to make them feel like men????

  7. Pingback: Expert: U.S. move on elephants creates ‘uncertainty’ | Human Nature - Conservation International Blog

  8. Pingback: ‘My Africa’ field notes: Good fences can make uneasy neighbors | Human Nature - Conservation International Blog

  9. Pingback: In case you missed it: 3 big stories from our world | Human Nature - Conservation International Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *